3.1.2 Family and Friends Arrangements for Children in Care |
RELATED CHAPTERS
Family and Friends Care Policy and Procedure
Placements with Connected Persons Procedure
Threshold of Care Panel Procedure
Legal Planning Meeting Procedure
RELEVANT LEGISLATION AND GUIDANCE
Children Act 1989 (as amended)
Human Rights Act 1998
Adoption and Children Act 2002
Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010 – Regulations 24 and 25
Standard 30, National Minimum Standards for Fostering Services 2011
Framework for Assessment of Children in Need and their Families, 2000
Family and Friends Care: Statutory Guidance for Local Authorities
AMENDMENT
This chapter was amended in September 2011 to incorporate the changes made by the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010 and associated Statutory Guidance in relation to placements of children in care with family and friends (now referred to as Connected Persons) – as set out in the Placements with Connected Persons Procedure.
Contents
- Decision to Look After and Place with Family, Friends or Connected Person Carers
- Becoming or Remaining Looked after in Family, Friends or Connected Person Care Arrangements
- Duty to Place Child in Care with Family, Friends or Connected Person Carers
- When to Consider Family Friends or Connected Person Care
1. Decision to Look After and Place with Family, Friends or Connected Person Carers
| 1.1 | Under Section 20 of the Children Act 1989, local authorities shall provide accommodation for a child in need who appears to them to require it as a result of there being no person with Parental Responsibility for him, or because he is lost and abandoned, or because the person who has been caring for him or her is prevented from providing suitable accommodation or care. |
| 1.2 | A local authority may not provide accommodation under this section for any child if any person objects who
(Section 20 (7) CA 1989) |
| 1.3 | The exceptions to this are:
|
| 1.4 | Regardless of whether the arrangement for family and friends care existed prior to the involvement of Children’s Social Care or subsequent to involvement in an assessment of need, a Threshold of Care Panel must be held before any decision can be taken that the child should become accommodated. Prior to accommodation status being agreed, support - financial and practical - may be provided under Section 17 Children Act 1989. |
| 1.5 | Only in circumstances where an Emergency Protection Order (EPO) is taken or accommodation is provided by agreement of the parent(s) as a direct alternative to seeking an EPO may the child become looked after and an immediate placement with a Connected Person be made in accordance with the Placements with Connected Persons Procedure. In such circumstances, an urgent Threshold of Care Panel must be convened. See Threshold of Care Panel Procedure. |
2. Becoming or Remaining Looked after in Family, Friends or Connected Person Care Arrangements
| 2.1 | As a guide, a child in family and friends care may need to become or remain Looked After: -
|
| 2.2 | If the child needs to become accommodated or subject to Care Proceedings, his/her carer/s must be assessed and approved to become foster carers – see Placements with Connected Persons Procedure. |
3. Duty to Place Child in Care with Family, Friends or Connected Person Carers
| 3.1 | Local authorities have a duty to consider whether Children in Care may be placed with relatives and friends. Prior to any accommodation being agreed with an unrelated carer, vigorous attempts to have identified and ruled out potential friends and family carers must be evidenced. |
| 3.2 | Exercising this duty requires that the local authority takes all reasonable steps to seek out and identify suitable relatives and friends with whom a Child in Care may be placed. The use of a Family Group Conference or Threshold of Care Panel meeting must address this, including as many members as possible of the family network who are significant to the child and who can assist in planning for the child. |
| 3.3 | Details of relatives and a full genogram should be recorded at an early stage of involvement. |
| 3.4 | Many parents will recognise the potential benefits of placing a child with a person known to them and will therefore agree to such arrangements directly or provide the child's social worker with details so that they can make such enquiries. |
| 3.5 | In cases where parents do not cooperate in providing contact details and addresses for relatives or friends who could be considered as potential carers, action must be taken to trace relatives via other means such as use of the electoral roll and legal advice sought. |
| 3.6 | In some instances, the duty to seek out Connected Persons as potential carers may conflict with the parent's wishes in respect of the child's placement. In these circumstances, before pursuing a placement with a Connected Person, careful consideration should be given to the potential consequences of placing the child with carers against the parents’ wishes. |
| 3.7 | In practice a balance must be struck between the benefits of the child living with a person he/she knows and the negative impact that action may have on partnership with parents and implementing both immediate and long term plans for the child. |
| 3.8 | However, bearing in mind the potential benefits for the child of placements with family, friends or Connected Persons, the circumstances in which the local authority would choose not to place with such a person, upholding the birth parents’ wishes, should only be when the level of conflict between the birth parents and potential carer is deemed to be detrimental to the child. |
| 3.9 | In practice it is not unusual for parents to oppose placement with friends and family initially but to change their view over time. Professional judgement about which course of action will best promote the child's welfare should take account of any available legal advice, particularly important where pursuit of a placement with a Connected Person could lead to the child's premature discharge from accommodation. |
4. When to Consider Family Friends or Connected Person Care
| 4.1 | A decision for a child to become Looked After must be informed by a Core Assessment involving multi-agency engagement, unless action needs to be taken within child protection processes to immediately safeguard the welfare of the child; in such cases the Core Assessment must immediately follow that action. This is the responsibility of the child’s social worker |
| 4.2 | The Core Assessment must be presented by the child’s social worker to a Threshold of Care Panel prior to the child becoming accommodated and where accommodation has been agreed in an emergency within 72 hours thereafter - see Threshold of Care Panel Procedure. |
| 4.3 | A decision to take Care Proceedings to secure the child’s welfare can only be taken following a Legal Planning Meeting and must be informed by a Core Assessment. In the event that an Emergency Protection Order is required, the authority of the Designated Manager (EPO Applications) is required and a Legal Planning Meeting must follow before any further applications to court see Legal Planning Meeting Procedure |
| 4.4 | Where a assessment concludes that a child needs to be Looked After away from home, the child’s social worker must consider:
|
| 4.5 | Where looked after status has been agreed and a Connected Person is available to care for the child, an immediate placement under the Placements with Connected Persons Procedure may be appropriate and as set out in that chapter the approval of a Service Manager to the placement must be obtained. |
| 4.6 | NB A Family Group Conference, Threshold of Care Panel, Child Care Review or Child Protection Conference may result in a proposal that a particular family member be considered to care for a child. However, the usual delegated authority and formal procedure to assess and approve will be required to implement the arrangements. These meetings do not in themselves confer authority to make such a placement. |
| 4.7 | When making a decision regarding the potential placement of the child with a Connected Person, the assessing social worker should consider:
|
End




